Loading market data…

Top Tax Court Cases

The most significant U.S. Tax Court and federal appellate decisions of the past 20 years — organized by topic, with holdings, significance, and outcomes. Transfer pricing, hobby loss, grouped elections, international tax, penalties, real estate, and more.

150

Total Cases

59

Taxpayer Won

83

IRS Won

8

Split Decision

150 of 150 cases

How to Apply These Rulings as a Reference

A practical framework for using case law in tax research and planning

Five-Step Research Framework

01

Identify the Issue

Isolate the specific legal question — e.g., "Is this activity a hobby or a business?" Use the topic filters to find cases on point.

02

Read the Holding

The holding states what the court actually decided on the facts before it. It is the only part that is binding precedent.

03

Compare the Facts

A ruling only controls if your facts are materially similar. Distinguish cases where the taxpayer's situation differs in a legally meaningful way.

04

Check Current Status

Verify the case has not been reversed, remanded, or superseded. Medtronic is a live example — still on remand as of 2025.

05

Apply the Rule

State the rule from the holding, apply it to your facts, and document the analysis. Cite the case with its full citation.

Understanding Precedential Weight

Strongest Authority

  • ·U.S. Supreme Court decisions — binding on all courts
  • ·Circuit Court of Appeals — binding in that circuit
  • ·Tax Court regular decisions (T.C.) — persuasive nationwide
  • ·Affirmed decisions — appellate court agreed with Tax Court

Persuasive Authority

  • ·T.C. Memo decisions — persuasive but not precedential
  • ·Decisions from other circuits — persuasive, not binding
  • ·Remanded cases — outcome still uncertain
  • ·Split decisions — weigh the specific issues decided

Use with Caution

  • ·Reversed decisions — no longer good law
  • ·Superseded by statute or regulation
  • ·Cases with materially different facts
  • ·Pre-TCJA cases on issues changed by 2017 reform

Common Mistakes When Citing Case Law

Citing a reversed or remanded case as settled law

Always verify current status using Westlaw, Lexis, or the Tax Court's own docket before citing. Medtronic, for example, was vacated again in 2025.

Treating a T.C. Memo as binding precedent

T.C. Memo decisions are persuasive only. Regular T.C. decisions carry more weight. Cite both if available, but distinguish their authority levels.

Applying a ruling without comparing the facts

Courts decide cases on their specific facts. A taxpayer who lost on hobby-loss grounds had different facts than yours — document why your facts are distinguishable.

Ignoring the circuit where the case will be litigated

Tax Court cases are appealable to the circuit where the taxpayer resides. A Ninth Circuit ruling is binding in the Ninth Circuit, not the Fifth. Know your circuit.

Relying on pre-TCJA cases without checking for statutory changes

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed many provisions. Cases decided under prior law may no longer reflect current statutory text.

Citing only the outcome without reading the holding

"Taxpayer won" does not mean the rule favors taxpayers broadly. Read the actual holding — courts often rule narrowly on specific facts.

Topic-Specific Application Notes

Transfer Pricing (§482)

Best-method selection is highly fact-specific. The IRS and taxpayer often disagree on which method applies — courts evaluate comparability, reliability, and the specific intangibles involved. Altera's Ninth Circuit reversal is the controlling rule on stock-based compensation in cost-sharing pools; Xilinx applies only to pre-2003 regulatory years.

Hobby Loss (§183)

Courts apply a nine-factor test. No single factor is determinative — the weight given to each depends on the activity. Profit motive is the central question; a history of losses is relevant but not dispositive. Document business-like conduct, expertise, and time devoted to the activity.

Passive Activity / Grouped Elections

Grouping elections are made on the return and are generally binding in subsequent years. Garnett established that LLC members and limited partners can qualify as material participants. Short-term rental exception (average stay ≤7 days) is a separate non-passive rule — document average rental period carefully.

International Tax / FBAR

Bittner (2023) limits non-willful FBAR penalties to one per year, not per account — a major taxpayer win. Farhy (2023) held the IRS cannot assess §6038 penalties administratively; they must sue in district court. Moore (2024) upheld the MRT but left broader realization questions open.

Penalties & §6751(b)

Graev and Chai established that supervisory approval of penalties must occur before the first formal communication proposing the penalty. If the IRS cannot show timely written approval, the penalty is invalid. This is a procedural defense worth checking in every examination.

Conservation Easements

The IRS has aggressively challenged syndicated conservation easements. Oakbrook Land Holdings (2022) upheld the perpetuity regulation. Most recent cases have gone against taxpayers on valuation and perpetuity grounds. Penalties are routinely sustained. Treat this area as high-risk.

Research tool only. This reference summarizes selected holdings for educational purposes. It is not legal or tax advice. Case law evolves — always verify current status and consult a qualified tax professional before relying on any case for a specific position. Some cases have been appealed, reversed, or superseded by subsequent authority.

Questions about a specific case?

Talk to a Former IRS Agent