The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 made more than 90 changes to the rules governing retirement accounts. Most of those changes are narrow technical corrections or minor adjustments that affect a small number of taxpayers. But buried in the legislation are several provisions that create meaningful planning opportunities — and a few that impose new requirements that advisors and taxpayers are still catching up to.

This is not a comprehensive summary of every provision. It is a focused analysis of the changes that are most likely to affect your tax plan.

The most widely publicized change in SECURE 2.0 is the increase in the required minimum distribution starting age. Under prior law (as amended by the original SECURE Act in 2019), RMDs began at age 72. SECURE 2.0 increased that age in two steps:

• Age 73 for individuals who turn 72 after December 31, 2022 (i.e., born in 1951 or later)
• Age 75 for individuals who turn 74 after December 31, 2032 (i.e., born in 1960 or later)

The practical effect is that taxpayers born between 1951 and 1959 have an RMD starting age of 73. Taxpayers born in 1960 or later have an RMD starting age of 75.

This creates a longer window for Roth conversion planning. Every year that RMDs are delayed is a year in which the account balance can be converted to Roth at the taxpayer's discretion — potentially at lower tax rates than would apply once RMDs begin and stack on top of other income. For taxpayers in their late 60s and early 70s who have not yet started RMDs, the conversion window is now meaningfully longer than it was under prior law.

Under prior law, Roth accounts inside employer plans — Roth 401(k)s, Roth 403(b)s — were subject to RMDs during the owner's lifetime, unlike Roth IRAs. This created an awkward asymmetry: a taxpayer who wanted to avoid RMDs had to roll their Roth 401(k) into a Roth IRA before RMDs began.

SECURE 2.0 eliminates RMDs from Roth accounts in employer plans beginning in 2024. Roth 401(k) and Roth 403(b) balances are now treated the same as Roth IRAs for RMD purposes — no distributions required during the owner's lifetime.

This removes the primary reason to roll a Roth 401(k) into a Roth IRA before retirement. Taxpayers who prefer to keep assets in an employer plan (for creditor protection, investment options, or simplicity) can now do so without triggering RMDs on the Roth balance.

SECURE 2.0 made two changes to catch-up contributions that work in opposite directions.

The increase for ages 60–63. Beginning in 2025, participants who are ages 60, 61, 62, or 63 can make catch-up contributions to 401(k) plans of up to $10,000 (indexed for inflation), compared to the standard catch-up limit of $7,500 for participants age 50 and older. This is a meaningful increase for high earners in their early 60s who are in peak earning years and want to maximize pre-retirement accumulation.

The Roth mandate for high earners. Beginning in 2026, catch-up contributions made by participants with wages exceeding $145,000 (indexed) in the prior year must be made on a Roth (after-tax) basis. This applies to catch-up contributions to 401(k), 403(b), and governmental 457(b) plans.

The Roth mandate is a significant change for high-income employees who have been using catch-up contributions to reduce current taxable income. Those contributions will now be after-tax, with no current deduction — though the future growth and qualified distributions will be tax-free.

For taxpayers who expect to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement than they are today, this is a disadvantage. For those who expect rates to rise or who have significant pre-tax balances they want to offset with Roth accumulation, it may be neutral or even beneficial. The planning implication is that high earners approaching age 50 should model the after-tax cost of the Roth mandate against their expected retirement tax rate before assuming the change is harmful.

One of the more creative provisions in SECURE 2.0 allows unused 529 plan balances to be rolled over to a Roth IRA for the 529 beneficiary, subject to several conditions:

• The 529 account must have been open for at least 15 years
• The rollover is subject to the annual Roth IRA contribution limit ($7,000 in 2025, indexed)
• The lifetime rollover limit is $35,000 per beneficiary
• Contributions made to the 529 in the last five years (and earnings on those contributions) are not eligible for rollover
• The beneficiary must have earned income at least equal to the rollover amount

This provision addresses a longstanding concern about 529 plans: the risk of overfunding. Parents who saved aggressively for college and whose children received scholarships, attended lower-cost schools, or did not attend college at all were left with 529 balances that could only be used for education expenses or withdrawn with income tax and a 10% penalty on earnings.

The 529-to-Roth rollover provides a tax-efficient exit for those balances — effectively converting unused education savings into retirement savings for the beneficiary. The $35,000 lifetime limit is modest, but for a young adult with a partially unused 529, it represents a meaningful head start on Roth IRA accumulation.

The 15-year seasoning requirement means that 529 accounts opened today will not be eligible for rollover until 2040. Families with existing accounts should note the five-year lookback on recent contributions — contributions made in the last five years cannot be rolled over, which limits the ability to accelerate the strategy by making large contributions shortly before the rollover.

SECURE 2.0 allows employers to offer pension-linked emergency savings accounts (PLESAs) as a feature of defined contribution plans beginning in 2024. Employees can contribute up to $2,500 (indexed) to a PLESA on an after-tax basis, and the first four withdrawals per year are penalty-free.

The policy rationale is straightforward: employees who lack emergency savings are more likely to take early withdrawals or loans from their 401(k), which disrupts long-term retirement accumulation. A dedicated emergency fund within the plan structure is intended to reduce that leakage.

From a tax planning perspective, PLESAs are after-tax accounts — contributions are not deductible, and qualified withdrawals are tax-free. They function similarly to a Roth account with a lower contribution limit and more flexible withdrawal rules. For employees who do not have an emergency fund and whose employer offers a PLESA, this is a straightforward benefit worth using.

Beginning in 2024, employers can treat an employee's qualified student loan payments as elective deferrals for purposes of employer matching contributions. An employee who is paying down student loans and cannot afford to contribute to their 401(k) can now receive employer matching contributions based on their loan payments — without making any plan contributions themselves.

This provision does not change the tax treatment of the loan payments themselves. It simply allows the employer match to be triggered by loan payments rather than plan contributions. The match is contributed to the employee's plan account and is subject to normal vesting schedules.

For employees carrying significant student loan balances, this can meaningfully accelerate retirement savings during years when loan repayment crowds out plan contributions. The planning implication is straightforward: if your employer has adopted this feature, make sure your loan payments are being reported to the plan administrator.

Under prior law, the penalty for failing to take a required minimum distribution was 50% of the amount that should have been distributed. SECURE 2.0 reduced that penalty to 25%, and further to 10% if the failure is corrected within a two-year correction window.

This is a meaningful reduction in the cost of RMD errors, which are surprisingly common — particularly in the first year RMDs begin, when the calculation rules and deadlines are unfamiliar. The reduced penalty does not eliminate the obligation to take the RMD, but it significantly reduces the financial consequence of a missed or miscalculated distribution.

The SECURE 2.0 changes do not require immediate action for most taxpayers. But several provisions create time-sensitive planning windows:

If you are in your late 60s or early 70s with significant pre-tax retirement balances, the extended RMD window is an opportunity to accelerate Roth conversions before RMDs begin and compress your taxable income options.

If you are a high earner approaching age 50, model the impact of the Roth catch-up mandate before 2026. The after-tax cost may be less significant than it appears if your marginal rate in retirement is expected to be similar to your current rate.

If you have an overfunded 529 account that has been open for more than 15 years, the 529-to-Roth rollover is worth evaluating — particularly if the beneficiary is now working and has earned income.

If your employer has adopted student loan matching, confirm that your loan servicer is reporting payments in a format the plan administrator can use.

The retirement account rules are more complex than they have ever been, and SECURE 2.0 added another layer. The provisions that matter most depend entirely on your specific situation — your age, your account balances, your income, and your expected retirement tax rate. A thorough review with a tax advisor who understands the interaction between these rules is the most reliable way to identify which changes create opportunities for you.

• Individual Tax Planning
• Estate & Trust Planning
• Small Business Tax Strategy